Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Thursday, March 19, 2009
More News ya Need ta Know
AG Holder signals shift in marijuana policyBy DEVLIN BARRETT – 6 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Eric Holder has signaled a change in policy on medical marijuana.
The nation's top law enforcement officer has told reporters federal agents will target marijuana distributors that violate both federal and state law — a departure from the Bush administration which targeted medical marijuana dispensaries in California, even if they complied with that state's law.
In the conversation, Holder did not spell out exactly who would no longer face the prospect of raids by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
But he says cases in which pot dispensaries were believed to be adhering to California law were not a priority of the new Obama administration.
Results are in!
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Why I'm Not Against, Like, Oh Wow Man, Pot
By DR. SCOTT HAIG Thursday, Nov. 30, 2006We don't really know how many people smoke it. Some sources say 10 million Americans, others say 35 million. But a lot of people smoke pot and they don't seem very sick. Marijuana just won't go away. Everybody talks about it—many quite fondly. About everyone I know under 55 has smoked it. And they're all right. A few have that pothead "oh wow" personality, but so what? I don't know of one case of serious marijuana-related disease among my friends, family and acquaintances.
More Related
Q & A: Tommy Chong
10 Questions for Lynne Cheney
10 Questions for Mike Huckabee
At work I have to report the same thing. I've been in hospitals and around sick people for 26 years now. I've admitted plenty of patients who have owned up to using pot. I think I can often tell by how they act. But do the health effects of pot seem very serious? As dangerous as those of alcohol, tobacco, overworking, fashion magazines or overeating? Nope. In fact, the health effects of pot are not nearly as dangerous as the jail they throw you in for possessing it. Not even close. I'm not an oncologist, but I haven't seen a case of lung cancer clearly related to dope smoking. Memory loss, depression, anxiety? Could it be as bad as turning 50? As for it being a gateway drug — how about beer?
There are some reasonable medical uses for cannabis. One patient I knew could get relief from her chemotherapy-induced nausea from nothing other than smoking joints. She was dying in the Massachusetts General Hospital from Ewing's sarcoma at 19, so no one was going to stop her. The word on our oncology floors is that pot's a pretty good appetite stimulant and anti-emetic. A few patients have asked me for it in connection with this. But no, I have never actually written an outpatient prescription for Cannabinol, THC or marijuana leaf (and I have no idea where they could get one filled anyway).
The chief dangers of marijuana, practically, seem to spring from only one of its features: it's illegal. People get beat up, shot up and locked up because of the great amount of money that rides on selling the stuff, stuff that would be about as expensive as lettuce if it weren't against the law. I have treated people seriously hurt by the illegality of pot.
Do I recommend using it? No way. Never used it, even in the bad old days, and I hope that none of my kids ever do. There's something repulsive about the half-closed, red eyes — something that's selfish and irresponsible. The biggest reason I didn't smoke it in the '70s, when everybody I knew was trying "to get me high," was that I wanted to be able to tell my kids that I didn't so that they wouldn't. I feel strongly about it—it's really not my bag. But that's who I am. I also feel pretty strongly that nearly every child should study Latin—really—but I don't think we should lock them up if they don't.
For me, it's similar to the speed-reading phenomenon. In the '70s and '80s there were all sorts of advertisements for this great system that would help you read the whole Sunday Times in 15 minutes "with complete comprehension and recall." I almost sent away for it. I still wonder about it but am now pretty sure it doesn't work. Here's how I know: I have never met a single person who could do it. Hanging around with many big readers for the past 35 years I should have bumped into at least one who took the course and could actually read that fast. I can't help but think it's the same with pot. Hanging around with all sorts of big dope-smokers for the same 35 years I should have bumped into at least one or two with those "serious health effects". The fact is I haven't. But I would listen to any docs out there who have actually seen or treated diseases truly caused by pot.
Another undeniable is that pot has cachet among teens. Some kids between 13 and 19 are clearly willing to risk everything to smoke the stuff — they know how much trouble they can get in. The "smoker" label seems as important a part of their personae as their tastes in music and clothing — maybe more so because it's illegal. It's as defining for them as it was for my pothead friends in the '70s. Maybe they'll become investment bankers too.
An important "art of medicine" issue is sensitivity to the individual's right to self-determination. We work hard to respect patient choice. Lots of explaining, rebutting and cleaning up messes. And as the government should, we draw a line. I won't prescribe cyanide for a patient in pain, even if he asks for it, and the government shouldn't permit home nuclear bomb experiments, even for garage-inventors who promise to be careful.
But some people love cannabis and they're going to get it anyway. Good doctors do learn to persuade and cajole to gently make what we think is the right choice into the patient's choice. ("The girls in therapy really seem to get a kick out of you. Are you sure you don't want to go anymore?") The government equivalent of this is called "drug education" and it's fine. But when you try to change certain things by force, things close to the core about what folks love and hate, about their personalities, you just run into trouble. It doesn't work. You might knock down but you will never build up. This is why the government is better off out of the marijuana business.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Winning is Fun!
3rd Place- Ticket Number xxx8013
2nd Place- Ticket Number xxx8010
1st Place- Ticket Number xxx8034
Congratulations to our Grab Bag recepients, and good luck to everyone next week. May the force be with you.
Grab Bag recepients stop by sometime between Friday and Sunday to claim prize.
Green Light
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Monday, March 9, 2009
SOME RETURNING FAVORITES @ Sweet-D!
TEA has returned!
English Breakfast!
Jasmine Green! Red Tea!
Peppermint! Lavender!
Cranberry Orange!
Raspberry! Chai Tea!
Yerba Mate! Chamomile!
We also have
Apple Cider!
English Breakfast!
Jasmine Green! Red Tea!
Peppermint! Lavender!
Cranberry Orange!
Raspberry! Chai Tea!
Yerba Mate! Chamomile!
We also have
Apple Cider!
EDIBLES are in-stock now!
Cookies! Cupcakes!
Lollipops! Muffins!
Marshmallow Squares!
We have
Virgin Olive Oil
too
-----------------------------------------------------
So Come in and consume!
(while supplies last!)
Lollipops! Muffins!
Marshmallow Squares!
We have
Virgin Olive Oil
too
-----------------------------------------------------
So Come in and consume!
(while supplies last!)
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
WEEKEND SPECIALS!
Ready for the weekend?
Visit us at Sweet-D and Greenlight Discount Pharmacy on Friday and Saturday for these super specials:
Keep an eye out for future specials! Hope to see you soon at Sweet-D and Greenlight DP!
Visit us at Sweet-D and Greenlight Discount Pharmacy on Friday and Saturday for these super specials:
Receive a
FREE EDIBLE
with your purchase of an
Eighth (3.5g) or above!
FREE EDIBLE
with your purchase of an
Eighth (3.5g) or above!
Buy an Ounce and receive a
SELECTION OF EDIBLES
with our complements!
SELECTION OF EDIBLES
with our complements!
Keep an eye out for future specials! Hope to see you soon at Sweet-D and Greenlight DP!
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
More News ya Need ta Know

Supporters of programs to provide legal marijuana to patients with painful medical conditions are celebrating Attorney General Eric Holder’s statement this week that the Drug Enforcement Administration would end its raids on state-approved marijuana dispensaries.
Federal raids on medical marijuana distributors continued at least into the second week of Barack Obama’s presidency, when federal agents shut down at least two dispensaries in California on Feb. 3.
Holder was asked about those raids Wednesday in Santa Ana, Calif., at a news conference that was called to announce the arrests of 755 people in a nationwide crackdown on the U.S. operations of Mexican drug cartels. He said such operations would no longer be conducted.

“What the president said during the campaign ... will be consistent with what we will be doing here in law enforcement,” he said. “What (Obama) said during the campaign ... is now American policy.”
Obama indicated during the presidential campaign that he supported the controlled use of marijuana for medical purposes, saying he saw no difference between medical marijuana and other pain-control drugs.
“My attitude is if the science and the doctors suggest that the best palliative care and the way to relieve pain and suffering is medical marijuana, then that’s something I’m open to,” Obama said in November 2007 at a campaign stop in Audubon, Iowa. “There’s no difference between that and morphine when it comes to just giving people relief from pain.”
White House spokesman Nick Shapiro hinted at the policy shift shortly after the California raids, telling The Washington Times that the dispensaries were legal in California and that the Obama administration’s stance was that “federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












